The Great Cognitive Deflation: 2026, The DeepSeek Shock, and the Geopolitics of AI Dumping

Assembled by Dr. R. Grant Tate using Gemini 3.0 on 12/30/25

Note: I assembled this article after hearing Scott Galloway, on the Pivot podcast, explain one of his predictions for 2026. I was intrigued by his idea, particularly since I’ve found Scott’s forecasts to be extremely thoughtful, if not necessarily accurate. I offer this analysis to you as a provocative trigger to your planning for the next wave of AI. The list of references at the end may be particularly useful.-

Grant Tate

Executive Summary

The global artificial intelligence ecosystem stands at a precarious inflection point as it approaches 2026. After years of exponential capital expenditure defined by the “scaling laws” of American technology giants, the market faces a violent structural correction precipitated by a supply-side shock from the People’s Republic of China. This report, commissioned for enterprise leaders, strategic consultants, and policy professionals, provides an exhaustive analysis of the “AI dumping” phenomenon predicted by market analyst Scott Galloway and validated by the sudden market dominance of Chinese models like DeepSeek.

The core thesis examined herein is that Chinese state-backed entities, leveraging a “whole-of-nation” industrial strategy, are systematically flooding the global market with high-performance, low-cost artificial intelligence models. This strategy, analogous to the steel dumping of the early 2000s, utilizes massive state subsidies—specifically “compute vouchers” and energy arbitrage—to undercut the margin-rich business models of US incumbents. The emergence of DeepSeek’s R1 model in early 2025, which delivered reasoning capabilities comparable to OpenAI’s o1 at less than 5% of the training cost, serves as the definitive signal of this new economic reality.

This analysis explores the multifaceted dimensions of this shift. It details the technical architectures (Mixture-of-Experts, latent attention) that enable Chinese efficiency, the geopolitical maneuvering defining the “Splinternet,” and the profound deflationary ripple effects tearing through the US SaaS, semiconductor, and creator economies. Furthermore, it outlines the urgent strategic pivots required for US enterprises to survive in an era where intelligence is no longer a premium asset but a commoditized utility. As the cost of cognition collapses, value capture will migrate from model builders to system orchestrators, necessitating a fundamental reimagining of corporate strategy, workforce development, and national competitiveness.

---

1. The Macro-Strategic Context: The Galloway Prediction and the Bursting Bubble

1.1 The Anatomy of the Prediction

As the technology sector moved through 2025, the narrative of “AI exceptionalism”—the belief that artificial intelligence would perpetually command high margins and infinite capital investment—began to fray. Scott Galloway, a prominent market analyst and professor, articulated a controversial but increasingly validated prediction for 2026: the US AI bubble would not burst due to a lack of demand, but due to a massive, deflationary supply shock originating from China.¹

Galloway’s thesis challenges the prevailing orthodoxy of Silicon Valley. While US “hyperscalers” (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta) race to build trillion-dollar data center clusters based on the assumption that AI models will remain expensive, proprietary assets, Galloway argues that intelligence is rapidly becoming a commodity. He draws a direct historical parallel to the global steel industry of the early 21st century. Just as China subsidized its domestic steel production to flood global markets, driving prices down and hollowing out Western industrial capacity, it is now applying the same mercantilist playbook to algorithmic intelligence.²

The mechanism of this “AI dumping” is precise: flood the developer ecosystem with open-source models that perform as well as, or better than, American closed-source models, but at a fraction of the cost—or entirely for free.¹ By doing so, Chinese firms depress the pricing power of the “Magnificent Seven,” turning high-margin API businesses into a race to the bottom. Galloway notes that by late 2025, over 80% of startups in top-tier venture portfolios were already utilizing Chinese open-source architectures, signaling that the commoditization of the model layer is well underway.¹

1.2 The Economic Vulnerability of the US “Mag 7”

The vulnerability of the US tech giants lies in their cost structure. Companies like OpenAI and Google have committed to a capital expenditure (CapEx) roadmap that presumes a high cost per unit of intelligence to recoup investments in $50,000 H100 GPUs and gigawatt-scale data centers.² OpenAI, for instance, has projected revenue growth based on enterprise pricing tiers that sustain these massive infrastructure costs.

However, if a Chinese competitor can deliver equivalent reasoning capabilities for pennies on the dollar, the economic logic of the US build-out collapses. Galloway highlights the fragility of this “duopoly” (OpenAI and Nvidia), noting that the market is pricing in perpetual growth that ignores the deflationary pressure of open-source software.¹ If the cost of inference (running the model) drops by 90% due to Chinese efficiency innovations, the projected returns on US infrastructure investments turn negative, potentially triggering a broader market recession and a re-rating of the S&P 500.²

1.3 The Catalyst: Why 2026?

The year 2026 is identified as the tipping point because it represents the convergence of three critical trend lines:

1. Maturity of Chinese Models: By 2026, models like DeepSeek, Qwen, and Yi have overcome the “quality gap,” consistently matching GPT-5 class performance in reasoning and coding benchmarks.³

2. Infrastructure Saturation: The constraints on the US energy grid (waiting times of 5-8 years for new data center connections) will hit a crisis point, while China leverages its “Eastern Data, Western Computing” grid to bring massive capacity online.²

3. Open Source Proliferation: The ecosystem of tools surrounding Chinese open-source models (agents, RAG pipelines, fine-tuning harnesses) will have matured, making them easier to deploy for enterprise “Shadow AI” than restrictive US models.⁴

---

2. The Engine of Dumping: The Chinese AI Industrial Complex

To understand how China can afford to “dump” AI, one must analyze the state-directed industrial apparatus that supports it. Far from the laissez-faire venture capital model of Silicon Valley, the Chinese AI sector operates as a coordinated “Whole-of-Nation” effort designed to bypass US sanctions and capture global market share.

2.1 The “Compute Voucher” Subsidy Mechanism

The primary economic lever enabling low-cost Chinese AI is the “compute voucher” (算力券). In a direct intervention to subsidize the operational costs of AI startups, local governments across China—including Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, and Chengdu—have rolled out voucher programs valued between $140,000 and $300,000 per eligible company.⁵

These vouchers function as direct currency for renting GPU time in state-backed data centers. For a startup like DeepSeek (based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province), these subsidies dramatically lower the effective cost of training and inference.⁸ While a US startup must raise venture capital to pay Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Azure at market rates (which include profit margins for the cloud provider), a Chinese startup utilizes state infrastructure at a subsidized, near-zero marginal cost.⁹

This mechanism effectively transfers the capital risk of AI development from the private sector to the public balance sheet. It allows Chinese firms to price their APIs below the cost of electricity and hardware depreciation, fitting the classical definition of “dumping”.⁵ The strategic intent is clear: to lower the barrier to entry so aggressively that Chinese models become the default choice for global developers, particularly in cost-sensitive markets in the Global South and among Western SMBs.³

2.2 Infrastructure Advantage: Eastern Data, Western Computing

Supporting the voucher system is the massive “Eastern Data, Western Computing” (EDWC) initiative. This national infrastructure project routes data from the economically developed eastern seaboard (where demand is high) to the resource-rich western provinces (where renewable energy is abundant and cheap).⁵

The US faces severe bottlenecks in data center expansion due to grid capacity and the high cost of land and power in hubs like Northern Virginia. In contrast, China creates “compute clusters” in regions like Guizhou and Inner Mongolia, where electricity costs are a fraction of US rates.² This energy arbitrage is a critical component of the cost structure. When DeepSeek claims a training cost of $5.6 million, it is utilizing this subsidized energy and infrastructure ecosystem, rendering direct comparisons with OpenAI’s $100 million training runs economically deceptive.¹⁰

2.3 The Open-Source Strategy as Asymmetric Warfare

China’s embrace of open-source AI is a calculated geopolitical move. While US firms like OpenAI and Google have moved toward closed, proprietary systems to protect their IP and margins, Chinese champions like Alibaba (Qwen), 01.AI (Yi), and DeepSeek have flooded platforms like Hugging Face with open-weights models.³

This “Android Strategy” serves to:

1. Undercut US Sanctions: By releasing model weights publicly, Chinese firms ensure their technology cannot be effectively blocked by US export controls or software bans. Once the weights are on BitTorrent or Hugging Face, they proliferate globally, beyond the reach of the US Department of Commerce.¹³

2. Erode US Soft Power: By providing state-of-the-art intelligence for free, China positions itself as the benevolent supplier of technology to the developing world. Nations in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, priced out of the OpenAI ecosystem, are standardizing on Chinese architecture.³

3. Weaponize Commoditization: If the best model is free, the profit pool for US companies evaporates. This forces US firms to compete on “services” and “trust” rather than raw intelligence, an area where they are currently vulnerable due to high costs.⁴

---

3. The Technical Catalyst: How DeepSeek Broke the Paradigm

The theoretical threat of AI dumping became a tangible market shock with the ascent of DeepSeek. In early 2025, this relatively unknown lab (spun out of the quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer) released DeepSeek-R1, a model that fundamentally altered the trajectory of the AI industry.¹⁰

3.1 The R1 Shock and Market Reaction

DeepSeek-R1 was released with a stated training cost of approximately $5.6 million—a figure that shocked industry observers accustomed to the multi-hundred-million-dollar training runs of GPT-4 and Claude 3.5.¹⁰ Despite this low cost, R1 achieved benchmark scores on the MATH-500 and AIME evaluations that rivaled, and in some cases surpassed, OpenAI’s premier reasoning model, o1.¹⁸

The market reaction was swift and violent. Nvidia’s stock price experienced a significant correction, shedding nearly $600 billion in market value in the days following the revelation.¹⁶ The logic was simple: if DeepSeek proved that “scaling laws” (which demand exponentially more chips for linear gains) were flawed, and that software optimization could substitute for brute-force hardware, then the projected demand for Nvidia’s H100 and Blackwell chips was drastically overstated.¹⁶

3.2 Architectural Innovations: Efficiency Over Brute Force

DeepSeek’s ability to undercut US pricing is not magic; it is engineering. The model utilizes a specific set of architectural innovations designed to maximize performance on constrained hardware (specifically, the restricted Nvidia H800 chips available in China).¹⁰

3.2.1 Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)

DeepSeek R1 utilizes a massive Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. Unlike a “dense” model (like GPT-4’s suspected early versions) which activates all neural parameters for every query, an MoE model activates only a small subset of relevant “experts” for each token generated.¹⁸

• Impact: This reduces the computational cost of inference (running the model) by approximately 95% compared to a dense model of equivalent parameter count. It allows DeepSeek to serve API requests at $0.14 per million tokens while US competitors struggle to break even at $1.10.¹⁸

3.2.2 Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA)

To handle long contexts (up to 128,000 tokens) without exploding memory costs, DeepSeek implemented Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA). This technique compresses the Key-Value (KV) cache—the memory required to store the context of the conversation—significantly reducing the RAM required on GPUs.²¹ This innovation allows the model to run on fewer, older GPUs, bypassing the need for the absolute cutting-edge memory bandwidth of the banned H100s.²¹

3.2.3 FP8 Quantization

DeepSeek leveraged low-precision training (FP8), representing numbers with fewer bits than the standard 16-bit or 32-bit floating point formats. This effectively doubles the throughput of existing hardware and reduces memory footprint, further driving down the cost per token.²³

3.3 The Distillation Controversy

A darker dimension of the DeepSeek story involves allegations of “model distillation.” The House Select Committee on the CCP released a report alleging that DeepSeek likely utilized outputs from OpenAI’s models to train its own.²⁴

• The Mechanism: Distillation involves querying a superior “teacher” model (like GPT-4) with complex questions and using its high-quality answers to train a smaller “student” model (DeepSeek). This allows the student to mimic the reasoning patterns of the teacher without incurring the massive trial-and-error cost of discovering those patterns from scratch.²⁴

• Implications: If true, this is a form of intellectual property arbitrage. US investors effectively subsidized the R&D of Chinese models. While US firms spent billions to create intelligence, Chinese firms spent millions to copy it. This asymmetry is central to the “dumping” thesis: you can always sell cheaper if you didn’t pay for the R&D.²⁵

---

4. Geopolitics, Sanctions, and the “Splinternet”

The rise of Chinese AI has triggered an aggressive decoupling of the global technology ecosystem. By 2026, the “Splinternet”—the bifurcation of the internet into US-led and China-led spheres—has fully extended to the cognitive layer.

4.1 US Policy Response: The Trump AI Doctrine

In January 2025, the Trump administration issued Executive Order 14179, titled “Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence”.²⁶ This order represented a sharp pivot from the safety-focused approach of the Biden administration (EO 14110).

• Deregulation for Dominance: The central tenet of EO 14179 is that maintaining AI supremacy requires removing regulatory friction. It directs agencies to rescind safety mandates that slow down innovation and to prioritize the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure (energy, data centers).²⁶

• The “Manhattan Project” Approach: The administration has signaled a willingness to use state power to support US tech giants, including facilitating land grants for data centers and negotiating energy deals, effectively countering China’s state subsidies with a US version of industrial policy.²⁸

4.2 The Chip War: Leakiness and Loopholes

The US effort to strangle Chinese AI via semiconductor export controls has shown mixed results. While restrictions on advanced GPUs (Nvidia H100/H200) remain in place, the DeepSeek shock proved that “compliance chips” (like the H800 and H20) were sufficient for training frontier models when combined with software innovation.⁴

• 2025 Updates: In response, the Department of Commerce issued new “AI Diffusion” rules and stricter controls on “Gate-All-Around” (GAA) transistors.²⁹ However, the administration has also explored “revenue sharing” models, allowing some chip sales to China in exchange for fees, highlighting the tension between hurting US chipmakers’ revenue and hurting Chinese AI progress.³¹

4.3 The Clean Network Redux: Security Bans

As Chinese models proliferated, the US government moved to ban their use in sensitive sectors.

• Federal Bans: The US Navy, Pentagon, and NASA issued memos in early 2025 strictly prohibiting the use of DeepSeek and other Chinese LLMs on government devices.³³

• State-Level Bans: States including Texas, Virginia, and New York enacted similar bans for state agencies and contractors.³³

• The China Mobile Connection: Security researchers discovered that DeepSeek’s authentication infrastructure contained hardcoded links to China Mobile, a state-owned telecom designated as a “Chinese Military Company.” This raised fears that user prompts—potentially containing sensitive corporate or government data—were being harvested by the CCP, validating the “trojan horse” theory of AI dumping.²⁴

---

5. Economic Impact Analysis: The Great Deflation

The economic consequences of AI dumping are deflationary and disruptive, affecting stock valuations, business models, and labor markets across the US economy.

5.1 The “Mag 7” and the End of Premium Pricing

The most immediate impact of AI dumping is the erosion of pricing power for the US technology giants.

• Margin Compression: US hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) rely on high margins from AI services to justify their trillion-dollar valuations. If a Chinese competitor offers equivalent reasoning for 1/20th the price, US firms are forced to lower prices to compete, compressing margins.²

• The “Netscape” Risk: Galloway warns that companies like OpenAI could become the “Netscape” of this era—pioneers who prove the market exists, only to be commoditized by cheaper, faster followers.¹ If the “moat” of proprietary models evaporates, the value shifts to those who own distribution (Apple, Google) or physical infrastructure, leaving pure-play model builders exposed.

5.2 The Commoditization of SaaS (Service-as-Software)

The availability of cheap, high-reasoning agents threatens the traditional SaaS business model.

• The Invisible UI: In an agentic world, human users do not log into dashboards; they instruct agents. This renders the User Interface (UI)—often the primary differentiator for SaaS tools—irrelevant.³⁵

• Seat-Based Pricing Collapse: SaaS companies traditionally charge per “seat” (user). If a single AI agent can do the work of 10 humans, the customer buys fewer seats. Furthermore, if the agent can build its own mini-apps on the fly using code generation (powered by DeepSeek-Coder), the need for rigid, pre-packaged SaaS tools diminishes.³⁶

• The “Wrapper” Wipeout: “Thin wrapper” startups that simply put a UI over GPT-4 are obliterated. They cannot compete with free open-source agents that users can run locally.³⁵

5.3 Disruption of the Creator Economy

The creator economy faces a “gutting” due to the flood of AI-generated content.

• Supply Shock: AI video generators and writing tools allow for the infinite production of high-fidelity content at near-zero marginal cost. This creates a supply shock in the attention economy, driving advertising rates (CPM) down.³⁷

• The Calacanis Thesis: Investor Jason Calacanis predicts that by 2026, this dynamic will make it impossible for human creators to earn a living from ad revenue alone. The economy shifts from “creation” to “verification” and “live interaction,” which are harder for AI to replicate.³⁷

---

6. The Rise of Agentic AI and the Shadow Ecosystem

By 2026, the AI narrative has shifted from “chatbots” to “agents”—autonomous systems that plan, execute, and iterate.

6.1 DeepSeek’s Agentic Roadmap

DeepSeek is not just selling a model; it is building an agentic ecosystem. The release of DeepSeek-V3.2 and DeepSeek-R2 in 2026 focuses on “Thinking in Tool-Use”.³⁸

• The Planner-Worker Architecture: Developers are utilizing DeepSeek R1 as a “Planner” (the brain) that breaks down complex tasks into steps. It then delegates execution to smaller, faster “Worker” models. Because R1 is cheap, it can afford to “think” (iterate and self-correct) for long periods, a luxury that is cost-prohibitive with expensive US models.³⁹

6.2 Shadow AI in the Enterprise

The massive cost disparity has created a “Shadow AI” crisis in US enterprises.

• The Risk: Employees, under pressure to be productive, are bypassing IT controls to use cheap or free Chinese tools (DeepSeek, Qwen) on their personal devices or via unauthorized APIs. This results in sensitive corporate data—codebases, financial projections, strategy documents—being uploaded to servers subject to Chinese national intelligence laws.⁴¹

• Data Sovereignty: With no GDPR-equivalent protecting data sent to China, and with the “China Mobile” backdoor identified, US companies face a silent hemorrhage of intellectual property through these shadow channels.³⁴

---

7. Strategic Responses for US Enterprises

To survive the deflationary shock and security risks of 2026, US enterprises must adopt a defensive and offensive strategy centered on “Hybrid AI.”

7.1 The Hybrid AI Architecture

The dominant enterprise strategy for 2026 is Hybrid Orchestration.⁴⁴ Companies should not choose between “US” or “Chinese” models but deploy them in a tiered architecture:

• Tier 1 (High Security/Complexity): Use trusted US frontier models (GPT-5, Claude 3.5) for customer-facing interactions, sensitive data processing, and tasks requiring high trust.

• Tier 2 (Bulk Intelligence): Use open-weights Chinese models (Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek) hosted locally in private clouds or colocation centers. This allows the enterprise to capture the cost benefits ($0.14/1M tokens) without exposing data to Chinese servers.⁴⁴

• The Colocation Pivot: Moving AI workloads to colocation centers allows companies to control the hardware and the network, creating a “clean room” for running untrusted models safely.⁴⁴

7.2 Governance and the AI Supply Chain

Consultants and leaders must implement rigorous AI Supply Chain Auditing.⁴⁶

• The Audit: Just as manufacturing companies audit their physical supply chain for forced labor or sanctions violations, software companies must audit their “cognitive supply chain.” Does a third-party SaaS tool rely on DeepSeek under the hood? Is data being routed through a non-compliant API?

• Governance Frameworks: Adopting frameworks like the NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001 is no longer optional; it is a defensive necessity to detect and block Shadow AI usage.⁴⁷

7.3 Cost Optimization (FinOps for AI)

With intelligence becoming a commodity, the focus shifts to FinOps.

• Arbitrage: Smart enterprises will build “Model Routers” that dynamically send queries to the cheapest model capable of answering them. Simple queries go to a local Qwen model; complex reasoning goes to GPT-5. This arbitrage maximizes margin while maintaining quality.⁴⁹

---

8. Transforming Education and the Future of Work

The labor market impacts of cheap AI are profound, creating a crisis for entry-level workers and necessitating a curriculum overhaul.

8.1 The “Junior Developer” Crisis

With agents like DeepSeek-Coder capable of generating production-ready code, the economic rationale for hiring junior developers to do “grunt work” has vanished.⁵¹

• The Broken Rung: This creates a crisis of talent pipeline. If juniors aren’t hired to learn on the job, how do they become seniors?

• University Response: Universities like Columbia and UCSD have overhauled their Computer Science curricula. The focus has shifted from syntax (writing code) to systems (reviewing and architectural design). Students are taught to be “Editors in Chief” of AI-generated code, focusing on security, efficiency, and integration rather than boilerplate.⁵²

8.2 The “AI Orchestrator” MBA

Business schools are adapting by teaching Agentic Management.⁵⁴

• New Skills: MBAs are now taught to manage “silicon employees” (agents). The curriculum focuses on identifying workflows that can be automated, defining the “permission sets” for agents, and managing the risks of autonomous decision-making.⁵⁵

• Ethics as a Hard Skill: With the rise of deepfakes and bias, “Responsible AI” is a core competency. Managers must understand the legal and reputational risks of deploying agents.⁵⁶

---

9. Conclusion: The Industrial Phase of AI

The year 2026 marks the end of the “Hype Phase” of Artificial Intelligence and the beginning of the “Industrial Phase.” The “DeepSeek Shock” and the broader phenomenon of Chinese AI dumping have successfully punctured the artificial price floor maintained by US tech monopolies, initiating a period of profound cognitive deflation.

This transition is painful for incumbents. The stock valuations of the “Mag 7,” predicated on high margins, face a violent correction as the market adjusts to the reality of commoditized intelligence. The “Galloway Prediction” is validating itself in real-time: the bubble is bursting not because AI is useless, but because it is becoming too cheap.

However, for the broader economy, this deflation is a catalyst for productivity. The availability of near-free reasoning allows for the construction of complex, agentic workflows that were previously cost-prohibitive. For US enterprises, the path forward lies in Hybrid Resilience: leveraging the efficiency of commoditized models while building moats around proprietary data, system orchestration, and trusted physical-world interfaces.

The winners of the 2026 landscape will not be the companies that build the smartest models—a game now dominated by state-subsidized dumping—but the companies that apply those models to solve tangible problems with speed, security, and architectural elegance.

---

Key Recommendations Matrix for US Stakeholders

---

End of Report

Works cited

1. Scott Galloway sees everything in 2026, but Nvidia will crash, TikTok will be worth its weight in gold, and you won’t invest. - NeoFeed, accessed December 30, 2025, https://neofeed.com.br/negocios/scott-galloway-ve-de-tudo-em-2026-mas-a-nvidia-vai-cair-o-tiktok-vale-ouro-e-voce-nao-vai-investir/en/

2. 2026 Predictions | No Mercy / No Malice, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.profgalloway.com/2026-predictions/

3. China Decode: How an AI Price War Could Spark a Market Correction | The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway | rova, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.rova.nz/podcasts/the-prof-g-pod-with-scott-galloway/episodes/china-decode-how-an-ai-price-war-could-spark-a-market-correction

4. Low-cost Chinese AI models forge ahead, even in the US, raising the risks of a US AI bubble, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/11/low-cost-chinese-ai-models-forge-ahead-even-us-raising-risks-us-ai-bubble

5. From Vouchers to Visas: China’s Innovative Plan for AI Dominance, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.fpri.org/article/2025/09/from-vouchers-to-visas-chinas-innovative-plan-for-ai-dominance/

6. China offers computing vouchers to support AI startups in competing with tech giants., accessed December 30, 2025, https://dig.watch/updates/china-offers-computing-vouchers-to-support-ai-startups-in-competing-with-tech-giants

7. China Offers “Computing Vouchers” to AI Startups Amid U.S. Chip Restrictions - CryptoRank, accessed December 30, 2025, https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/26e04-china-offers-computing-vouchers-to-ai

8. Beyond DeepSeek: How China’s AI Ecosystem Fuels Breakthroughs | Lawfare, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/beyond-deepseek--how-china-s-ai-ecosystem-fuels-breakthroughs

9. China provides ‘computing vouchers’ for AI startups to train large language models — designed to combat rising GPU costs due to US sanctions | Tom’s Hardware, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/china-provides-computing-vouchers-for-ai-startups-to-train-large-language-models-designed-to-combat-rising-gpu-costs-due-to-us-sanctions

10. DeepSeek: cheap, powerful Chinese AI for all. What could possibly go wrong? | John Naughton | The Guardian, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/01/ai-deepseek-cheap-china-google-apple

11. DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI o1: Installation, Features, Pricing - Cody, accessed December 30, 2025, https://meetcody.ai/blog/deepseek-r1-open-source-installation-features-pricing/

12. AI to play key role in revving up industrial upgrades - Chinadaily.com.cn, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202512/22/WS69488430a310d6866eb2fb52.html

13. Meta scales back AI open-source plans over security fears - Tech in Asia, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.techinasia.com/news/meta-scales-back-ai-open-source-plans-over-security-fears

14. Open-Weight Chinese AI Models Drive Privacy Innovation in LLMs - Dark Reading, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.darkreading.com/cyber-risk/open-weight-chinese-ai-models-drive-privacy-innovation-llm

15. TAI #159: China’s Open-Model Offensive vs. Meta’s $multi-billion Gamble on AI Talent Acquisition - Towards AI, accessed December 30, 2025, https://pub.towardsai.net/tai-159-chinas-open-model-offensive-vs-meta-s-multi-billion-gamble-on-ai-talent-acquisition-aa928b684214

16. Top 10 Business Events in China in 2025: DeepSeek’s Overnight Virality, Labubu’s Global Buying Spree & “Epic” Food Delivery War Review, accessed December 30, 2025, https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3617421369705479

17. Taking Stock of the DeepSeek Shock | FSI - Cyber Policy Center - Stanford University, accessed December 30, 2025, https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/publication/taking-stock-deepseek-shock

18. DeepSeek vs OpenAI: Which Is the Best AI Model? - 365 Data Science, accessed December 30, 2025, https://365datascience.com/trending/deepseek-vs-openai/

19. DeepSeek-R1 vs o3-mini - LLM Stats, accessed December 30, 2025, https://llm-stats.com/models/compare/deepseek-r1-vs-o3-mini

20. DeepSeek, Huawei, Export Controls, and the Future of the U.S.-China AI Race - CSIS, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/deepseek-huawei-export-controls-and-future-us-china-ai-race

21. DeepSeek R1 Review: Features, Comparison, & More - Writesonic Blog, accessed December 30, 2025, https://writesonic.com/blog/deepseek-r1-review

22. DeepSeek R1 Vs O3-mini In Performance, Cost, And Usability Showdown - Dataconomy, accessed December 30, 2025, https://dataconomy.com/2025/01/31/deepseek-r1-vs-o3-mini-in-performance-cost-and-usability-showdown/

23. Difference between DeepSeek and OpenAI? : r/LocalLLaMA - Reddit, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1i71j8q/difference_between_deepseek_and_openai/

24. DeepSeek report - Select Committee on the CCP |, accessed December 30, 2025, https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/DeepSeek%20Final.pdf

25. House investigation into DeepSeek teases out funding, security realities around Chinese AI tool | CyberScoop, accessed December 30, 2025, https://cyberscoop.com/deepseek-house-ccp-committee-report-national-security-data-risks/

26. Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence - Federal Register, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02172/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence

27. Executive Order 14179 - Wikipedia, accessed December 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14179

28. January 2025 AI Developments – Transitioning to the Trump Administration, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.insidegovernmentcontracts.com/2025/02/january-2025-ai-developments-transitioning-to-the-trump-administration/

29. US Commerce Dept. Rule Expands Licensing Requirements for AI-Related Materials, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/01/us-commerce-dept-rule-expands-licensing-requirements

30. New U.S. Export Controls on Advanced Computing Items and Artificial Intelligence Model Weights: Seven Key Takeaways - Sidley Austin LLP, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.sidley.com/en/insights/newsupdates/2025/01/new-us-export-controls-on-advanced-computing-items-and-artificial-intelligence-model-weights

31. Trump Lifted the AI Chip Ban on China, Clearing Nvidia and AMD to Resume Sales - Built In, accessed December 30, 2025, https://builtin.com/articles/trump-lifts-ai-chip-ban-china-nvidia

32. US to allow powerful AI chip sales to China, Trump says - POLITICO Pro, accessed December 30, 2025, https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/12/u-s-to-allow-nvidias-h200-sales-in-china-trump-confirms-00681619

33. U.S. Federal and State Governments Moving Quickly to Restrict Use of DeepSeek, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.insidegovernmentcontracts.com/2025/02/u-s-federal-and-states-governments-moving-quickly-to-restrict-use-of-deepseek/

34. Researchers link DeepSeek’s chatbot to Chinese Mobile, telecom banned from operating in U.S. | PBS News, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/researchers-link-deepseeks-chatbot-to-chinese-mobile-telecom-banned-from-operating-in-u-s

35. The Rise of AI Agents: Impact on SaaS | Rōnin Consulting, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.ronin.consulting/artificial-intelligence/rise-of-ai-agents/

36. 2026 Predictions with Scott Galloway | Free Live Event - Section | AI, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.sectionai.com/events/live-events/2026-predictions-with-scott-galloway

37. Jason Calacanis Warns AI Videos Will Gut Creator Economy by 2026 - WebProNews, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.webpronews.com/jason-calacanis-warns-ai-videos-will-gut-creator-economy-by-2026/

38. The Ultimate DeepSeek Guide: Mastering the AI Landscape in 2026, accessed December 30, 2025, https://deepseek.ai/blog/deepseek-guide-2026

39. Build an AI Agent with Expert Reasoning Capabilities Using the DeepSeek-R1 NIM, accessed December 30, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/build-ai-agents-with-expert-reasoning-capabilities-using-deepseek-r1-nim/

40. Exploring the Power and Potential of DeepSeek-R1 in Computer-Use AI Agents, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.aiu.edu/innovative/exploring-the-power-and-potential-of-deepseek-r1-in-computer-use-ai-agents/

41. Are Your Employees Using DeepSeek? Top Shadow AI Security Concerns - Reco, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.reco.ai/blog/are-your-employees-using-deepseek-top-shadow-ai-security-concerns

42. Navigating DeepSeek: Key Concerns for U.S. Companies - NextLink Labs, accessed December 30, 2025, https://nextlinklabs.com/resources/insights/navigating-deepseek

43. DeepSeek: Legal Considerations for Enterprise Users | Insights | Ropes & Gray LLP, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/01/deepseek-legal-considerations-for-enterprise-users

44. New State of the Data Center Report Highlights Hybrid Infrastructure in the AI Era - CoreSite, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.coresite.com/blog/new-state-of-the-data-center-report-highlights-hybrid-infrastructure-in-the-ai-era

45. OpenAI-o3-mini vs DeepSeek-R1 - Medium, accessed December 30, 2025, https://medium.com/data-science-in-your-pocket/openai-o3-mini-vs-deepseek-r1-23326fa36e4b

46. AI Consulting and Support Services Analysis Report 2025-2032 with Market Positioning of Key Companies - Accenture, IBM, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, PwC, EY, McKinsey & Co, BCG, Tata Consultancy - ResearchAndMarkets.com - Business Wire, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251124215144/en/AI-Consulting-and-Support-Services-Analysis-Report-2025-2032-with-Market-Positioning-of-Key-Companies---Accenture-IBM-Deloitte-Touche-Tohmatsu-PwC-EY-McKinsey-Co-BCG-Tata-Consultancy---ResearchAndMarkets.com

47. How to Choose An AI Risk Management Framework [GUIDE] - Hyperproof, accessed December 30, 2025, https://hyperproof.io/guide-to-ai-risk-management-frameworks/

48. 3 AI Risk Management Frameworks for 2025 + Best Practices - Superblocks, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.superblocks.com/blog/ai-risk-management

49. Agents, innovation, and transformation - McKinsey, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/quantumblack/our%20insights/the%20state%20of%20ai/november%202025/the-state-of-ai-2025-agents-innovation_cmyk-v1.pdf

50. Deepseek: Features, Pricing & Accessibility in 2026 - Research AIMultiple, accessed December 30, 2025, https://research.aimultiple.com/deepseek/

51. Beyond learning to code: How 2025 transformed AI education and skills for the future, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.financialexpress.com/life/technology-beyond-learning-to-code-how-2025-transformed-ai-education-and-skills-for-the-future-4092158/

52. Adapting Computer Science Education to a Changing Tech Landscape, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.engineering.columbia.edu/about/news/adapting-computer-science-education-changing-tech-landscape

53. ​​​​​​​Transforming Computer Science Education in the Age of AI, accessed December 30, 2025, https://today.ucsd.edu/story/transforming-computer-science-education-in-the-age-of-ai

54. New MBA Blends AI Focus and Flexible Paths | Sacred Heart University, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.sacredheart.edu/news-room/news-listing/new-mba-blends-ai-focus-and-flexible-paths/

55. Generative AI and Agentic AI with Business Applications (Batch-3), accessed December 30, 2025, https://eep.iimb.ac.in/course/generative-ai-and-agentic-ai-with-business-applications/

56. MBA in Organizational Management: AI Business Strategy Concentration, accessed December 30, 2025, https://www.eastern.edu/academics/graduate-programs/mba-management/ai-business-strategy